For the first time in France, a law is adopted on the frame of exposure to electromagnetic waves. This is the beginning of a recognition of the danger of radio frequencies on health. Among recently published studies, that of Inserm confirms the link between the intensive use of the mobile phone and the appearance of brain tumors. But where does “intensive use” begin? And for which consumers? The answers are disturbing.
Since January 2013, Camille has telephoned 1433 hours with her mobile phone. At 31, she would have a risk of developing a brain tumor. This “positive association” between the use of the mobile phone and the development of brain tumors is the result of the study published by Inserm Unit 897 in Bordeaux in May 2014, one of the last – and rare – published on the subject . The work shows that “the massive use of the mobile phone, greater than or equal to 896 hours of calls, in a lifetime, would be associated with the development of brain tumors. In these people, the risk of having a positive association between the use of their mobile phone and the development of tumors is increased for those who call more than 15 hours per month. Amazingly precise numbers that rank Camille among the “heavy” mobile users, which she was far from imagining with her 16 hours and 38 minutes consumed last month. In twelve years, Camille has changed cell phone five times. Nobody told him to limit his calls, favor the headset and avoid calling in areas of poor reception. On the contrary, we have each time encouraged to take advantage of unlimited new offers.
According to the Regulatory Authority for Electronic Communications and Posts (Arcep), the 67 million French people holding a SIM card call on average 3 hours and 4 minutes per month. According to the conclusions of Inserm, the risk of developing a tumor would appear after 24 years of use, that is in a decade for people with a laptop since 2000. But the risk is much higher for the youngest, if we refer to a study carried out at the end of 2012 by the Association Santé Environnement France (Asef) with high school students from 12 schools in the Paca region: it shows that almost half of the students phone more than half an hour a day, 20% of them spending more than 2 hours of calls.
Professor Dominique Belpomme, oncologist, speaks of a “scientific denial” in the face of a future “health catastrophe”
When the World Health Organization (WHO) stated in 2009 that mobile phone use was “possibly” carcinogenic, studies and counter-studies on the subject have proliferated in Europe and the United States. , bringing more or less nuances to their conclusions. In 2013, the National Agency for Food Safety, Environment and Labor (ANSES) concluded in its report “Radiofrequency and health” that the use of the laptop did not present any “proven risks” but that it was necessary to continue the search. Jean-Pierre Marc-Vergnes, neuropsychiatrist and expert at ANSES, admits that “the management of the agency sometimes adapts its conclusions according to what is formulated by the public authorities, as was the case following the publication of the report of Afsset in 2009 “. A position that worries French associations such as Priartem, Robin des Toits or A land for EHS (electro-hypersensitive people) who denounce conflicts of interest aggravated by the economic crisis. The scientific community, for its part, finds a little more each day than the time of science is not the same as that of the industrialists.
Behind his desk full of handouts and scientific reports, Professor Dominique Belpomme, oncologist and president of the Association for Therapeutic Anti-cancer Therapy (Artac), leads alone with his small team his research on electro-hypersensitivity. Since 2008, he says he has examined more than 1,200 “sick”, the world’s largest series. He speaks of a “scientific denial” in the face of a future “sanitary disaster”, “a scandal a thousand times more important than asbestos, because it concerns billions of individuals who abuse the mobile phone”. However, he refuses to publish his results and declines invitations to ANSES hearings. Why ? Because the agency refused to finance his studies. “I had to find money in the United States, Canada and Sweden to do my research. My results therefore do not belong to France, and I am now waiting for the authorization of these countries to publish them “, justifies it.
The oncologist says using the cell phone for more than 20 minutes a day would cause long-term Alzheimer’s
The 71-year-old is convinced that mobile phone abuse (more than 20 minutes a day, according to him) will cause Alzheimer’s disease in the long term. “The big risk today is not cancer but the destruction of brain cells that causes Alzheimer’s disease. The youngest are the most exposed because they are the biggest users of the laptop and their brain is not mature before the age of 15 years. Today, I see more and more people, including young people, having symptoms of pre-Alzheimer-type mental confusion that can progress to dementia: lack of immediate memory, concentration, spatio-temporal disorientation. As in Britain, we should advise against the use of mobile phones under 15 years old and ask future mothers or young mothers to keep the phone as far as possible from their babies. I note, moreover, that women are more sensitive to electromagnetic fields because they represent two thirds of my patients, “he says.
The tests that Professor Belpomme has developed show that exposure to electromagnetic waves would cause in some people a problem of oxygenation of the brain which, in the worst case, would cause an “intolerance” to electromagnetic fields, going as far as standard electric current. According to his research, genetic factors favor this hypersensitivity. Some people have to protect their homes with special materials, or even take refuge far from cities to regain their abilities.
Jonathan, 32, is electro-sensitive. He is the first French to have benefited from a departmental aid to equip himself with anti-waves protections.
These patients, called electro-hypersensitive (EHS), are difficult to count, but would represent 1% to 10% of the population. We are talking about 25% at the end of the century. The pains they complain about are of a varied nature. However, in general, they suffer from migraines, digestive problems, joint pains, chronic fatigue or skin tingling. They are of particular interest to the public authorities, which commissioned ANSES for a specific study, which should be published this year.
Jean-Pierre Marc-Vergnes has been working on this issue since 2010 and says he wants to remain “very cautious” on this subject, which has taken “a political and polemical twist”. Aged 80, he presents himself as “an old researcher amortized who has nothing to expect from a scientific career” and can therefore get down to work on this thorny problem “where there are shots to take on all sides “.
It will start this year a research on electromagnetic hypersensitivity funded by ANSES, during which 60 people will be observed: cutaneous perception and responsiveness of the circuit of pain. The goal is to eventually establish a link between the pathologies of electrosensitive and those of chemo-sensitive (intolerance to products and chemical odors). For Dr. Marc-Vergnes, “if the medical profession is embarrassed, it is because it does not understand what these people in distress. Some doctors talk about mental disturbances, but I think they are slipping a bit. I met enough EHS to say that they are quite normal. Very reserved about the conclusions of this future report, however, he reveals an element drawn from his personal experience: “I believe that it is the people formerly known as spasmophiles that we now diagnose EHS. “
According to the French telecom federation, exposure to 3G and 4G is a hundred to a thousand times lower than 2G
Although the precise cause of these evils remains mysterious, their study could tell us more about the degree of impact of the waves around us and to which we are all exposed. We are currently living – in the cities in particular – in a composite smog called “smog” involving the waves of mobile phones, WiFi, Wimax, Bluetooth, 2G, 3G and now 4G. We do not know the exact effects of each other on our organisms, nor on each other. A spokesman for the French Federation of Telecoms (FFT), who prefers to remain anonymous, wants to be reassuring from his cell phone glued to the ear (because “he does not ask questions” despite the recommendations of his own federation of ‘use a headset) stating that’ exposure to 3G and 4G is one hundred to one thousand times lower than 2G ‘. According to him, “the risks of exposure to waves are not proven, as indicated by ANSES in its 2013 report, and the network deployed for twenty years by operators is protective of health, the environment and ensures a good quality of service “, before adding that the public realizes that” these services are useful to him […] and that the state is still very nice with anti-waves associations. “
Because, for him, their claims are unfounded. The associations nevertheless wish to lower the thermal threshold to 0.6 volts per meter (a level recommended in 2011 by the Council of Europe) instead of 41 to 61 volts per meter, thermal threshold set by a decree of 2002. “I come back from Florence, Italy, where there is a worry about electromagnetic waves. The limit values have been lowered to 0.6. The antennas have therefore all been elevated. It disfigures the landscape enormously, it’s a shame, “he laments. In Europe, other countries such as Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg, Poland and Greece have lowered their thresholds to 0.3 or 0.6 volts per meter. China, Russia and India have also made this choice, forcing operators to multiply the number of relay antennas by replacing them with less powerful ones. For the spokesman of the FFT, there is a “psychosis” in India, where “there are already many problems; so why not find a wrong problem as a derivative? “. A “false problem” that still raises real questions.
“Biological tests that leave no doubt”
Pr Dominique Belpomme (photo, sitting in the middle of his team), oncologist, practices biological tests on his patients that allow him to highlight their hypersensitivity. The pulsed cerebral doppler echo shows, for example, a hypovascularization of the brain (resulting in a lack of oxygen), especially in the limbic system, in people who call themselves electrohypersensitive. The doctor also notes biological abnormalities in the blood: increase in the level of histamine (related to immunity and allergies), abnormal presence of S100B protein (which helps to fix calcium and acts on cell proliferation) and, in a third of cases, melatonin (the sleep hormone) drops in the urine.
On the experimental level, he claims to have subjected a dozen patients to electromagnetic fields and to have established a direct link with biological abnormalities (as in rats subjected to the same tests). If the diagnosis is established – which was the case for 90% of the 1,200 people examined since 2008 – Professor Belpomme administers a treatment of antihistamines, antioxidants, natural anti-inflammatories and intensive vitamin therapy for allow revascularization of the brain. This makes it possible to “make everyday life bearable,” but he recommends not to phone with his cell phone for more than twenty minutes a day in six-minute sequences to avoid progression to Alzheimer’s disease. In the most severe cases, he advises to move away temporarily but quickly from all sources of electromagnetic fields, if at all possible.
Source Using the laptop and the appearance of brain tumors the risk is confirmed: and Paris Match: